Lawyers for a Florida attorney who is being sued by Epstein have disclosed
that they want to take a statement from the Duke because they believe he may
be able to shed fresh light on Epstein’s alleged sex offences.
Meanwhile the FBI has indicated that it will reopen its criminal investigation
into Epstein after receiving new information. He was convicted in 2008 for
soliciting an under-age girl for prostitution. Sources in America have said
the FBI could ask the Duke to give evidence as part of the new investigation.
Epstein, 58, was sentenced to 18 months in prison after admitting two sex
offences as part of a plea bargain deal. But allegations were made against
him by as many as 40 girls, of whom 17 have settled civil claims they
brought against the billionaire.
Epstein is himself suing Brad Edwards, a lawyer for several of the girls.
Epstein alleges that Mr Edwards was linked to a fraud committed by a former
colleague — a claim dismissed by the local bar association — and that his
clients’ cases against Epstein were therefore invalid.
Mr Edwards, meanwhile, claims Epstein is abusing the legal system by seeking
to intimidate other lawyers and girls, and is counter-suing the financier
for substantial damages.
He is seeking to prove to the court that Epstein did sexually abuse dozens of
children, allegedly at his Florida mansion in most cases, where the Duke
enjoyed holidays and massages. Jack Scarola, the lawyer representing Mr
Edwards, told The Daily Telegraph: “We would be very keen to speak with
Prince Andrew, given his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
“We want to obtain additional details on the scope of Mr Epstein’s alleged
sexual abuse of children — when, where, how frequently and the extent to
which it involved the transport of children inside and outside the United
States for sex.
“We have reason to believe that Prince Andrew has been in the company of Mr
Epstein while Mr Epstein has been in the company of under-aged children.”
Asked whether he had any reason to suspect the Duke had been present while
under-age girls were abused, Mr Scarola said: “That’s not something I can
publicly comment on. We have an ongoing investigation and an ongoing
prosecution of a civil case. These are not matters of public record and I am
restricted in what I can say on the public record.”
There is no allegation that the Duke had sexual contact with any of the girls
or that he was aware of any wrongdoing by Epstein.
Mr Scarola added: “Deposition testimony has been taken generally concerning Mr
Epstein’s association with many high-profile people.”
Documents filed in the case so far include Epstein’s private phone directory —
which included numerous contact details for the Duke, along with masseuses
and dozens of other prominent friends. They also include flight logs for
Epstein’s private jet, which detailed a trip the Duke took with him in 2000
and a 1998 meeting between Epstein, the Duchess of York and Princesses
Beatrice and Eugenie.
Mr Scarola said he anticipated “significant procedural impediments” in
obtaining sworn deposition from the Duke, due to his ability to claim
diplomatic immunity. He said he may be forced to turn to international law.
“The Hague Convention specifically outlines procedures that must be followed
for the citizen of one country to be compelled to give testimony regarding a
case pending in another,” he said.
A Buckingham Palace spokesman declined to comment.
No comments:
Post a Comment