Letters: Discredited foreign policy doctrines | Politics | The Guardian

• Friday 25 February 2011

• Article history

Someone needs to sit down Labour's shadow defence secretary, Jim Murphy, and teach him about the failure of the disastrous Nato attack on Serbia over Kosovo, and the elementary flaws in Tony Blair's attempt to justify it with his discredited doctrine of "humanitarian intervention" (Labour urged not to rule out military intervention, 22 February). Otherwise some future Labour government may be tempted to repeat past blunders instead of learning from them.

Contrary to the received wisdom, Mr Blair's cheerleading of the Nato bombing failed to stop ethnic cleansing in Kosovo (the exodus of refugees began only after the launch of the Nato attack); or to replace Serbian control of Kosovo by an international administration (which was achieved by flexible US-Russian-Finnish diplomacy when the bombing was going nowhere); or to topple Milosevic (the Serbian electorate did that months later). The Nato intervention was illegal (never authorised by the UN), based on a false prospectus (the Rambouillet conference concocted a pretext for attacking Serbia), unnecessary (the possibilities of a peaceful solution had not been exhausted) and incompetently executed (thousands of innocent civilians killed, non-military targets destroyed). The delusion that the Kosovo aggression was both a success and a personal triumph for Mr Blair clearly encouraged a repetition of all the Kosovo blunders in Iraq, four years later. Never again, thanks, Mr Murphy.

Brian Barder

London

 

• These were the noble words of Obama in his speech on Libya (Report, 24 February): "The suffering and bloodshed is outrageous and it is unacceptable. In a volatile situation like this one, it is imperative that the nations and peoples of the world speak with one voice." These fine words led the news bulletins in all electronic and printed media. But Obama's hyprocrisy is transparent if one applies these to his policies and those of his predecessors in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Palestine. Take note, Mr Obama, that the second part of your statement is equally applicable to your veto of the UN resolutions condemning Israel.

SK Krishnan

Buckhurst Hill, Essex

 

• It's right that the "international community", as represented by David Cameron, William Hague et al, is outraged by Gaddafi's use of the weapons of war, including air power, against its civilian populace. But where are the protests from this community when, as it still regularly does, Israel uses fighter-bombers and tanks against the civilian Palestinian Arab population of the occupied territories, for whose security it is supposed to be responsible under the Geneva conventions? Gaddafi still has a way to go before he matches the civilian toll Israel's army and air force took in Gaza in the three weeks after Christmas 2008.