The tea party movement, which established its power last year by defeating Republicans who didn’t meet their idea of what a conservative ought to be, is shifting to a more policy-driven focus as its leaders try to expand its growth and effectiveness.
The strategy appears to be working, both on the presidential campaign trail, where most candidates are eagerly embracing tea party priorities, and in Washington, where loyalists are setting the terms of the debate over taxes and spending.
The Washington Post's Anqoinette Crosby talks with Post reporter Amy Gardner about the Tea Party's policy-driven focus.
On Capitol Hill, congressmen elected on the tea party wave of 2010 have helped grind to a halt negotiations over raising the debt ceiling with their objections to any deal that includes more taxes. The more vocal among them question the establishment wisdom that a default on federal debt would precipitate an economic catastrophe. And they have pushed many of the presidential contenders to adopt similar points of view.
At a campaign appearance in Iowa on Monday morning, former Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty said Republicans in Congress should use the debate to achieve deep budget cuts and long-term spending reforms. Failing that, he has said lawmakers should allow the country to default.
Rep. Michele Bachmann, appearing in Columbia, S.C., signed her own version of U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint’s “Cut, Cap and Balance” pledge, which the House will take up Tuesday. In addition to the three-part promise to cut spending enough to reduce the deficit next year, enact “enforceable” spending caps and approve a constitutional amendment requiring a balanced budget, Bachmann added her own line to repeal and defund President Obama’s health-care legislation.
Most of the other candidates, including Romney, have signed DeMint’s version of the pledge.
While potentially broadening its appeal, going after policies instead of people protects the tea party movement against picking a losing fight that could sink its popularity. And it illustrates the view that defeating President Obama is more important than disqualifying a Republican candidate who might be best positioned to do it.
A year ago, for instance, Mitt Romney would have been the perfect tea party target: a Republican who has called for emissions reductions to combat global warming and who, as governor of Massachusetts, signed a health-care overhaul that was a model for the landmark federal legislation.
So far, though, most tea party leaders are not directly taking on Romney — some are even backing him.
“I don’t agree with Mitt Romney on everything,” said U.S. Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), a darling of the tea party movement who surprised some conservatives by endorsing Romney last month. “But I want to beat Barack Obama, and I think he’s the best person to do that.”
DeMint, who endorsed Romney in his 2008 bid for president but has stayed neutral this year, said he’s “going to talk good about all the candidates, because I don’t know who is going to wind up being the nominee. None of them are going to be perfect. We’re not
95
Comments